Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in France
- 25 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 277 (24) , 1935-1939
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540480035035
Abstract
Objectives. —To assess the impact of the implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules on radiography requests in French hospitals during a 5-month intervention period and the impact of using posters alone to sustain the effect of the rules during a 5-month postintervention period. Design. —Multicenter randomized controlled trial preceded and followed by observational studies of radiological practices. Setting. —The emergency departments of 5 Paris university teaching hospitals of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. Patients. —A total of 2218, 1911, and 851 patients—all aged 18 years and older—who were seen for acute ankle or midfoot injuries in emergency departments during preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods, respectively. Intervention. —Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules by emergency department physicians in the intervention hospitals (using meetings, posters, pocket cards, and data forms). During the postintervention period, posters alone were used to sustain the intervention effect. Main Outcome Measure. —Percentage of patients for whom radiography was requested. Results. —During the preintervention period, 98% and 98.5% of patients were referred for radiography in the intervention and control groups, respectively. During the intervention period, the mean proportions of patients referred for radiography by physicians was 78.9% in the intervention group and 99% in the control group (P=.03). Between preintervention and intervention periods, a relative reduction of 22.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.8%-24.9%) in radiography requests was observed in the intervention group, while requests increased by 0.5% (95% CI, 0%-1.4%) in the control group. During the postintervention period, the proportion of radiography requests in the intervention hospitals was lower than the proportion observed in the preintervention period (83.1% vs 98%). Conclusions. —Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules significantly reduced radiography requests in French hospitals. Using a minimal postintervention implementation strategy, the effect of this intervention decreased but persisted after it was discontinued.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Advances: Posters for accident departments: simple method of sustaining reduction in x ray examinationsBMJ, 1995
- A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuriesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department?BMJ, 1987
- Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.BMJ, 1986
- Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1986
- The ankle injury—indications for the selective use of X-raysInjury, 1983
- Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.BMJ, 1981
- Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.BMJ, 1979
- Reasons for requesting radiographs in an accident department.BMJ, 1979
- Incidence of minor fractures in twisting injuries of the ankleInjury, 1974