Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message

This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:

• Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials.
  Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2002
• Editor's notes
  New Directions for Mental Health Services, 1997
• Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions?
  Law and Human Behavior, 1996
• Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1994
• Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury
  Law & Society Review, 1992
• The self-defense defense and community sentiment.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1991
• Dirty tricks of cross-examination: The influence of conjectural evidence on the jury.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1990
• Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1989
• Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.
  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
• Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1988