Column regeneration in an Ordovician crinoid (Echinodermata): paleobiologic implications
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Paleontology
- Vol. 67 (6) , 1068-1070
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000025403
Abstract
The crinoid column is a paradox of crinoid paleontology. The crown is required for taxonomic identification and, therefore, prerequisite for phylogenetic, paleoecologic, or other studies. However, column elements (columnals and pluricolumnals) are by far the most common crinoidal fossil remains. The biostratigraphic utility of crinoid columns has been demonstrated in some cases (e.g., Donovan, 1984), but this is done with the risk of developing a parataxonomy among crinoids because in most cases columnals are not associated with crowns and, therefore, cannot be assigned to crown species with certainty.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regeneration in sea liliesNature, 1992
- Paleoecology of hardground encrusting and commensal crinoids, Middle Ordovician, TennesseeJournal of Paleontology, 1992
- The improbability of a muscular crinoid columnLethaia, 1989
- Phanerozoic development of tiering in soft substrata suspension-feeding communitiesPaleobiology, 1986
- Feeding Posture of Modern Stalked CrinoidsNature, 1974