The Politics of Evidence
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 16 (3) , 395-404
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285482
Abstract
The evidenced-based movement has influenced medical research to the point that the agendas and methods of qualitative inquiry are often excluded from resources of medical granting agencies. Yet, its narrow definition of what constitutes evidence and its myopic vision about health must be challenged. In this article, the author argues that qualitative research does contribute to a reduction in morbidity and mortality without the cost in dollars and lives that are necessarily incurred in evidence-based inquiry. She asserts that we must reframe our definition of evidence to meet this new ethic of inquiry—which she calls the ultimate ethic—as a way of conducting research.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- It Is Time to Revise the Cochrane CriteriaQualitative Health Research, 2006
- Beyond the Clinical Trial: Expanding Criteria for EvidenceQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Evidence‐Based Medicine, Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects, and the Trouble with AveragesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological AgendaQualitative Health Research, 2004
- Family therapy and the politics of evidenceJournal of Family Therapy, 2004
- Reading Qualitative StudiesInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2002
- Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systemsBMJ, 2000
- Sounds of comfort in the trauma center: How nurses talk to patients in painSocial Science & Medicine, 1996