Predicting Patterns of Crop Damage by Wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 12 (1) , 156-168
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x
Abstract
Crop loss to wildlife impedes local support for conservation efforts at Kibale National Park, Uganda. Systematic monitoring of crop loss to wildlife (mammals larger than 3 kg) and livestock was conducted in six villages around Kibale over a 2‐year period. Five wildlife species accounted for 85% of crop damage events: baboons, bushpigs, redtail monkeys, chimpanzees, and elephants. Marked variation in frequency and extent of damage is reported within villages, between villages, and between wildlife species. Fields lying within 500 m of the forest boundary lost 4–7% of crops per season on average, but the distribution of damage was highly skewed such that maize and cassava fields were on occasion completely destroyed. Multivariate analysis was used to test predictors of damage, including human population density, guarding, hunting, sight distance, and distance from the forest. Tests were performed at two levels of analysis, field and village. Distance from the forest edge explained the greatest amount of variation in crop damage, although hunting also influenced the extent of crop damage. Elephants inflicted catastrophic damage to farms but their forays were rare and highly localized. Livestock caused considerable damage to crops but farmers seldom complained because they had institutionalized modes of restitution. Although most of the crop damage by wildlife is restricted to a narrow band of farmers living near the forest edge, risk perception among these farmers has been amplified by legal prohibitions on killing wild animals. Elevating local tolerance for wildlife will require diverse approaches, including channeling economic benefits to Kibale’s neighbors and providing compensation in limited cases.Predicción de Patrones de Daño a Cosechas por Vida Silvestre en los Alrededores del Parque Nacional Kibale en UgandaPérdidas de cosechas debido a vida silvestre impide el soporte local para los esfuerzos de conservación del parque nacional Kibale en Uganda. Monitoreos sistemáticos de pérdidas de cosechas debido a vida silvestre (mamíferos > 3 kg) y ganado fueron conducidos en seis villas de los alrededores de Kibale por un período de 2 años. Cinco especies de vida silvestre fueron responsables del 85% de los eventos perjudiciales en las cosechas: baboons, bushpigs, monos cola roja, chimpancés y elefantes. Se reporta una marcada variación en la frecuencia y extensión del daño reportado dentro de las villas, entre villas y entre especies. Campos ubicados dentro de 500 m de los limites del bosque perdiéron 4–7% de las cosechas por temporada en promedio, sin embargo, la distribución del daño estuvo altamente sesgada de tal manera que los campos de maíz y cassava fueron en ocasiones completamente destruídos. Se utilizó un análisis multivariado para probar predicciones de daño, incluyendo densidad humana poblacional, cuidado, caza, visibilidad y distancia del bosque. Las pruebas fueron realizadas a dos niveles de análisis: campo y villa. La distancia al límite del bosque explicó la mayor cantidad de varaición en daño a las cosechas aunque la caza también influyó en la extensión del daño. Elefantes provocaron daños catastróficos en granjas, pero sus incursiones fueron raras y altamente localizadas. El ganado causó considerable daño a cosecha, pero los granjeros rara vez se quejaron, puesto que existen formas institucionales de restitución. Aunque la mayoría del daño a cosechas causado por vida silvestre es restringido a una banda angosta de granjas localizadas cerca de los límites del bosque, la perceptión del riesgo entre estos granjeros ha sido ampliada por prohibiciones legales en el sacrificio de animales silvestres. Incrementar la tolerancia local hacia la vida silvestre requerirá de diversas aproximaciones incluyendo la canalización de beneficios económicos para los vecinos del parque Kibale y en algunos casos, proveer compensaciones.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Farming the Forest Edge: Vulnerable Places and People around Kibale National Park, UgandaGeographical Review, 1997
- The Conflict between Wildlife and Local People Living Adjacent to Protected Areas in Tanzania: Human Density as a PredictorConservation Biology, 1994
- Promising future for an elephant population – a case study in Burkina Faso, West AfricaOryx, 1993
- Forest elephants in a rainforest fragment: preliminary findings from a wildlife conservation project in southern GhanaAfrican Journal of Ecology, 1992
- Wildlife Utilization and Local People: A Case-study in Upper Lupande Game Management Area, ZambiaEnvironmental Conservation, 1992
- Population Densities and Patterns of Habitat Use Among Anthropoid Primates of the Ituri Forest, ZaireBiotropica, 1991
- Possible Role of Plantations for Lemur Conservation in Madagascar: Food for Folivorous SpeciesFolia Primatologica, 1991
- Vocalizations, phylogeny and palaeogeography of red colobus monkeys (Colobus badius)African Journal of Ecology, 1981
- Forest and primate conservation in East AfricaAfrican Journal of Ecology, 1981
- Past and Present Status of the Elephant in UgandaThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1962