Quantitative detection of micrometastases in the lymph nodes of gastric cancer patients with real‐time RT‐PCR: A comparative study with immunohistochemistry
Open Access
- 13 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 105 (1) , 136-143
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11031
Abstract
Histologic examination lacks the sensitivity to detect micrometastases in gastric cancer lymph nodes. In the present study, we applied a real‐time RT‐PCR approach to the quantitative detection of micrometastases in gastric cancer lymph nodes and compared diagnostic power with routine histology and immunohistochemistry. We studied 392 lymph nodes from 21 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery. Real‐time quantitative RT‐PCR was performed on a LightCycler instrument using a hybridization probe for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin‐20 (CK20) as marker genes. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies to wide‐keratin was also performed in the lymph nodes to compare the sensitivity and specificity. Median (average) values of CEA mRNA in lymph nodes in patients with histology+, immunohistochemistry+/histology−, immunohistochemistry−/histology− and negative control results were 4,600 (16,000), 200 (400), 0 (9.8) and 0 (0.6), respectively. There were some false‐negative results with simple CEA and CK20 real‐time RT‐PCR due to the presence of low gene‐expressing gastric cancers as revealed by CEA and CK20 immunohistochemistry. CEA in combination with CK20 (duplex) real‐time RT‐PCR partially covered this weakness. Consequently, all 71 histology+ lymph nodes were positive for duplex real‐time RT‐PCR as well as wide‐keratin immunohistochemistry. Positivity rates by histology, wide‐keratin immunohistochemistry and duplex real‐time RT‐PCR were 18.0% (71/392), 20.9% (82/392) and 25.8% (101/392), respectively. In 2 of 8 patients with pT1N0, positive lymph nodes were observed by real‐time RT‐PCR but not by immunohistochemistry. These results indicate that duplex quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR is the most sensitive method for detecting micrometastases and useful for evaluating the prognostic significance of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer patients.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- REAL TIME REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION OF URINARY CYTOKERATIN 20 DETECTS TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA CELLSJournal of Urology, 2001
- Detection and Prediction of Micrometastasis in the Lymph Nodes of Patients With pN0 Gastric CancerAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Classification of isolated tumor cells and micrometastasisCancer, 1999
- Unreliability of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting contaminating breast cancer cells in peripheral blood stem cells due to induction of CEA by growth factorsBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Clinicopathological value of immunohistochemical detection of occult involvement in pT3N0 gastric cancerGastric Cancer, 1999
- Micrometastases and Survival in Stage II Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen‐expressing Free Tumor Cells in Peritoneal Washes from Patients with Gastric Carcinoma by Polymerase Chain ReactionJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1997
- Detection of Gastric Cancer Micrometastases in Lymph Nodes by Amplification of Keratin 19 mRNA with Reverse Transcriptase‐Polymerase Chain ReactionJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1996
- Differences in Messenger RNA Expression of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Surgical Specimens of Colorectal CarcinomaTumor Biology, 1992
- The Most Important Prognostic Factors for Gastric Cancer Patients: A Study Using Univariate and Multivariate AnalysesScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1987