Treatment of Pyonephrosis: A Comparative Study
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 120 (3) , 287-289
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57139-6
Abstract
A comparison of treatments used for 97 patients with pyonephrosis was made. The patients were divided into 3 groups: cases in which a primary nephrectomy was done, cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a nephrostomy and cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a translumbar percutaneous puncture with an Ingram catheter indwelling. Patients in whom nephrostomy and puncture were used had the highest percentage of complications, while primary nephrectomy produced the best results. Primary nephrectomy is the procedure of choice, using drainage through a puncture only when the general status of the patient does not permit primary nephrectomy.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Nephropyelostomy in the Management of Acute PyohydronephrosisRadiology, 1976
- Suprapubic cystotomy by trocar catheter: A preliminary reportAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1972
- Silverman Needle NephrostomyJournal of Urology, 1967
- PERCUTANEOUS TROCAR (NEEDLE) NEPHROSTOMY IN HYDRONEPHROSISJAMA, 1955
- Preliminary Nephrostomy Preparatory to Secondary NephrectomyJournal of Urology, 1949
- Nephrostomy as a Preliminary Drainage in Preparation for Secondary NephrectomyJournal of Urology, 1934