Risk of Restenosis and Health Status Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
- 15 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 111 (6) , 768-773
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000155242.70417.60
Abstract
Background— Previous comparisons of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have demonstrated similar survival but have also generally found better health status outcomes (symptoms, function, and quality of life) with CABG. The principal limitation of PCI has been the occurrence of restenosis. No previous studies comparing the health status outcomes of PCI and CABG have examined differences in these outcomes as a function of patients’ preprocedural risk for restenosis.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disease-Specific Health Status After Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryCirculation, 2003
- A comparison of the recovery of health status after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repositoryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The STS National Database: current changes and challenges for the new millenniumThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Five-Year Clinical and Functional Outcome Comparing Bypass Surgery and Angioplasty in Patients With Multivessel Coronary DiseaseA Multicenter Randomized TrialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Medical Care Costs and Quality of Life after Randomization to Coronary Angioplasty or Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation)The Lancet, 1995
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993