Ten Steps to Developing a National Agenda to Address Financial Conflicts of Interest in Industry Sponsored Clinical Research
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Accountability in Research
- Vol. 12 (2) , 139-155
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620590957229
Abstract
Financial liaisons between clinical researchers, research institutions, and industrial sponsors have gained momentum in recent years. In the process, it has been argued by many that trust in the research infrastructure is being eroded by the financial conflicts of interest that emerge from these arrangements. Yet, the financial resources of industry are needed to continue technology transfer from the bench to the bedside. Policy makers and government regulators are currently struggling to determine how to best manage financial conflicts of interest that emerge from these liaisons. Various organizations and governmental entities have proposed different strategies. This paper explores the limitations of existing measures and recommends that a unified national agenda is needed. We propose 10 steps to develop an agenda to address financial conflicts of interest in industry-sponsored clinical research.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trialBMJ, 2004
- Potential research participants’ views regarding researcher and institutional financial conflicts of interestJournal of Medical Ethics, 2004
- Research Accountability and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Industry Sponsored Clinical Research: A ReviewAccountability in Research, 2003
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trialBMJ, 2002
- Sponsorship, Authorship, and AccountabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Adverse events reporting—the tip of an icebergAccountability in Research, 2001
- A National Survey of Policies on Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Conflict-of-Interest Policies for Investigators in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Institutional Conflict of InterestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995