A comparison of LC and SFC for cellulose‐ and amylose‐derived chiral stationary phases
- 1 January 1995
- Vol. 7 (5) , 311-325
- https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.530070502
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Supercritical Fluid Chromatographic Separation of .beta.-Blockers on Chyrosine-A: Investigation of the Chiral Recognition Mechanism Using Molecular ModelingAnalytical Chemistry, 1995
- Cellulosic Chiral Stationary Phase Under Reversed-Phase ConditionJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1993
- Role of Solvents in the Resolution of Some Beta-Adrenergic Blockers on Cellulose 3, 5-Dimethylphenyl Carbamate Chiral Stationary PhaseJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1993
- Resolution of enantiomers by HPLC on tris(4‐alkoxyphenylcarbamate)s of cellulose and amyloseChirality, 1993
- Unusual Solvent and Temperature Effects with a Poly(triphenylmethyl Methacrylate) Column for Chiral Liquid ChromatographyJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1992
- Direct enantiomeric separation of β‐blockers on ChyRoSine‐a by supercritical fluid chromatography: Supercritical carbon dioxide as transient in situ derivatizing agentChirality, 1992
- Resolution of Enantiomers by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography with Cellulose Tris(phenylcarbamate) Coated on Silica GelBulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1990
- Optical Resolution of Racemic Drugs by Chiral HPLC on Cellulose and Amylose Tris(phenylcarbamate) DerivativesJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1988
- Optical Resolution of Alcohols as Carbamates by HPLC on Cellulose Tris(phenylcarbamate) DerivativesBulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1987
- Optical rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism of carbanilyl polysaccharidesBiopolymers, 1969