Comparison of Observer and Videodensitometric Measurements of Simulated Coronary Artery Stenoses
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 22 (7) , 562-568
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198707000-00006
Abstract
To test the applicability of an automated vessel measurement technique to coronary arteriography, a videodensitometric method with caliper measurements on digital subtraction images of a moving coronary artery phantom was compared. Percent diameter stenosis was determined by both methods, revealing a twofold improvement in reproducibility with the videodensitometric method, with percent stenosis being determined within .+-. 10% for two different iodine concentrations injected during continuous flow into the simulated coronary arteries. Absolute diameters were also measured by the videodensitometric method, showing a high degree of correlation between measured and true diameter for vessels between 0.5-3.0 mm.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection and quantitation of coronary artery stenoses from digital subtraction angiograms compared with 35-millimeter film cineangiogramsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: Diameter versus densitometric area measurementsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms.Circulation, 1983
- Coronary Artery Narrowing in Coronary Heart Disease: Comparison of Cineangiographic and Necropsy FindingsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation.Circulation, 1977