Descent with modification and the archaeological record
- 12 April 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 366 (1567) , 1070-1079
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380
Abstract
Recent years have seen major advances in our understanding of the way in which cultural transmission takes place and the factors that affect it. The theoretical foundations of those advances have been built by postulating the existence of a variety of different processes and deriving their consequences mathematically or by simulation. The operation of these processes in the real world can be studied through experiment and naturalistic observation. In contrast, archaeologists have an ‘inverse problem’. For them the object of study is the residues of different behaviours represented by the archaeological record and the problem is to infer the microscale processes that produced them, a vital task for cultural evolution since this is the only direct record of past cultural patterns. The situation is analogous to that faced by population geneticists scanning large number of genes and looking for evidence of selection as opposed to drift, but more complicated for many reasons, not least the enormous variety of different forces that affect cultural transmission. This paper reviews the progress that has been made in inferring processes from patterns and the role of demography in those processes, together with the problems that have arisen.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- What drives the evolution of hunter–gatherer subsistence technology? A reanalysis of the risk hypothesis with data from the Pacific NorthwestPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2011
- Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures?Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2011
- Population size predicts technological complexity in OceaniaProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- Evolution in ArchaeologyAnnual Review of Anthropology, 2008
- Natural selection and cultural rates of changeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Response to our criticsBiology & Philosophy, 2007
- A Unified Evolutionary Model of Archaeological Style and Function Based on the Price EquationAmerican Antiquity, 2007
- A Geographically Explicit Genetic Model of Worldwide Human-Settlement HistoryAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2006
- Cultural Transmission and Stochastic Network GrowthAmerican Antiquity, 2003
- Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic EuropeAmerican Antiquity, 2001