Indirect Benefits of Subsidized Housing Programs
- 31 December 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 48 (4) , 432-440
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976815
Abstract
This article's review of the social science literature provides little support for the widely accepted belief that government subsidized housing programs have neighborhood spillover effects and that the programs produce indirect benefits over larger areas. In particular, the evidence on the relationship between housing programs and property values is contradictory and confusing. Of the recent HUD funded studies reviewed in this article, only one supports the existence of neighborhood spillover effects. In the Urban Homesteading Demonstration, higher investments and property values radiated out from homesteading sites during the 1970s. This program is, however, relatively unique in terms of the magnitude and visibility of improvements to individual dwellings. The preceding indicates that government subsidized housing programs will have to be justified on the basis of the direct benefits provided to participants rather than on any possible indirect effects.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dynamics of Neighborhoods A Fresh Approach to Understanding Housing and Neighborhood ChangeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1980
- Measuring the External Effects of Public ProgramsEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1977
- The Housing of NationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Neighborhood upgrading effects of middle-income housing projects in New York CityJournal of Urban Economics, 1974
- Family Stability: A Comparison of Trends Between Blacks and WhitesAmerican Sociological Review, 1971