WITHIN‐ AND BETWEEN‐GENERATION EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON THE MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
- 1 June 1996
- Vol. 50 (3) , 1205-1218
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02361.x
Abstract
We investigated the effects of developmental and parental temperatures on several physiological and morphological traits of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Flies for the parental generation were raised at either low or moderate temperature (18°C or 25°C) and then mated in the four possible sex-by-parental temperature crosses. Their offspring were raised at either 18°C or 25°C and then scored as adults for morphological (dry body mass, wing size, and abdominal melanization [females only]), physiological (knock-down temperature, and thermal dependence of walking speed), and life history (egg size) traits. The experiment was replicated, and the factorial design allows us to determine whether and how paternal, maternal, and developmental temperatures (as well as offspring sex) influence the various traits. Sex and developmental temperature had major effects on all traits. Females had larger bodies and wings, higher knock-down temperatures, and slower speeds (but similar shaped performance curves) than males. Development at 25°C (versus at 18°C) increased knock-down temperature, increased maximal speed and thermal performance breadth, decreased the optimal temperature for walking, decreased body mass and wing size, reduced abdominal melanization, and reduced egg size. Parental temperatures influenced a few traits, but the effects were generally small relative to those of sex or developmental temperature. Flies whose mother had been raised at 25°C (versus at 18°C) had slightly higher knock-down temperature and smaller body mass. Flies whose father had been raised at 25°C had relatively longer wings. The effects of paternal, maternal, and developmental temperatures sometimes differed in direction. The existence of significant within- and between-generation effects suggests that comparative studies need to standardize thermal environments for at least two generations, that attempts to estimate “field” heritabilities may be unreliable for some traits, and that predictions of short-term evolutionary responses to selection will be difficult.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (BSR‐9301151)
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- An experimental study of evolution in progress: Clines for quantitative traits in colonizing and Palearctic populations ofDrosophilaEvolutionary Ecology, 1995
- A Method for Rapid Measurement of Heat or Cold Resistance of Small InsectsFunctional Ecology, 1992
- A Consensus Combined P-Value Test and the Family-Wide Significance of Component TestsBiometrics, 1990
- Causes of variation in wing loading among Drosophila speciesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1989
- Laboratory Evolution of Epicuticular Hydrocarbon Composition and Cuticular Permeability in Drosophila pseudoobscura: Effects on Sexual Dimorphism and Thermal-Acclimation AbilityEvolution, 1989
- Developmental Temperature and Life Span in Drosophila melanogasterGerontology, 1986
- Geographic Variation of Tolerance to Environmental Stress in Drosophila pseudoobscuraThe American Naturalist, 1983
- Relative male age, fertility, and competitive mating success inDrosophila melanogasterBehavior Genetics, 1980
- Epigenetic influences on the lifespan of the Drosophila: Existence of an optimal growth temperature for adult longevityExperimental Gerontology, 1975
- Parental Age and the OffspringThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1964