Science in Archaeology: The Saints Go Marching In
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 42 (3) , 330-349
- https://doi.org/10.2307/279060
Abstract
The New Archaeology has been said to involve a new view of culture and a heightened appreciation of the way to do science. By way of examining these claims, a review is made of three well known studies in which archaeologists popularly assigned to that movement attempt to relate the distributions of archaeological materials to patterns of post-marital residence. One of the studies is found to be possibly successful, the others probably unsuccessful, and the conclusion is that no such relationship is demonstrated. Although the conceptual framework of the studies is impressive, at least two of them are found to suffer from an insufficiency of rigor in testing their hypotheses. It is suggested that the conceptual framework is not peculiar to the New Archaeology, and that the shortcomings in testing relate to a misapprehension of scientific method.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Broken K Revisited: A Short Discussion of Factor AnalysisAmerican Antiquity, 1975
- Some Uses of R-Mode Analysis in ArchaeologyAmerican Antiquity, 1974
- Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study. William A. Longacre. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, No. 17, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1970. vi + 57 pp. 17 figs., 9 tables. $4.00American Antiquity, 1973
- The Reconstruction of Kinship from Archaeological Data: The Concepts, the Methods, and the FeasibilityAmerican Antiquity, 1971
- Science, Theory, and Reality in the “New Archaeology”American Antiquity, 1969
- A Prehistoric Community in Eastern ArizonaSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1966
- Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture ProcessAmerican Antiquity, 1965
- Archeology as Anthropology: A Case StudyScience, 1964
- Male and Female Adaptations in Culture ChangeAmerican Anthropologist, 1958