The Reliability, Discrimination and Difficulty of Word-Knowledge Tests Employing Multiple Choice Items Containing Three, Four, or Five Alternatives
- 1 March 1973
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian Journal of Education
- Vol. 17 (1) , 63-68
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417301700107
Abstract
The multiple-choice item found on standardized and teacher-made tests typically requires the examinee to choose among either four or five alternative answers. The present study offers some evidence favouring three-option over four-option items. Word knowledge tests containing three, four, and five-option items were developed and administered to pupils in ten upper primary classes from schools in the Adelaide metropolitan area. In each of the classes, item discrimination was better and reliability was higher for the three-option test compared to the test employing four-option items. The five-option test was also superior to the four-option test. Differences between the three and five-option tests on reliability and item discrimination were not significant.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Optimal Number of Alternatives in Multiple-Choice Achievement Tests: Some Empirical Evidence for a Mathematical ProofEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- On the optimal number of alternatives at a choice pointJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964
- Notes on a suggested index of item validity: The U-L Index.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1951
- Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of VariancePsychometrika, 1941