Borrowing Information Across Populations in Estimating Positive and Negative Predictive Values
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Vol. 60 (5) , 633-653
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.00761.x
Abstract
Summary: A marker’s capacity to predict the risk of a disease depends on the prevalence of disease in the target population and its accuracy of classification, i.e. its ability to discriminate diseased subjects from non-diseased subjects. The latter is often considered an intrinsic property of the marker; it is independent of disease prevalence and hence more likely to be similar across populations than risk prediction measures. In this paper, we are interested in evaluating the population-specific performance of a risk prediction marker in terms of the positive predictive value PPV and negative predictive value NPV at given thresholds, when samples are available from the target population as well as from another population. A default strategy is to estimate PPV and NPV using samples from the target population only. However, when the marker’s accuracy of classification as characterized by a specific point on the receiver operating characteristics curve is similar across populations, borrowing information across populations allows increased efficiency in estimating PPV and NPV. We develop estimators that optimally combine information across populations. We apply this methodology to a cross- al study where we evaluate PCA3 as a risk prediction marker for prostate cancer among subjects with or without a previous negative biopsy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curveBiometrika, 2009
- Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case–control designsBiostatistics, 2008
- Adjusting for Covariates in Studies of Diagnostic, Screening, or Prognostic Markers: An Old Concept in a New SettingAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- PCA3: A Molecular Urine Assay for Predicting Prostate Biopsy OutcomeJournal of Urology, 2008
- The Analysis of Placement Values for Evaluating Discriminatory MeasuresBiometrics, 2004
- Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomesBiostatistics, 2004
- Using Weighted Rankings in the Analysis of Complete Blocks with Additive Block EffectsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979
- Using Weighted Rankings in the Analysis of Complete Blocks with Additive Block EffectsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979
- The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of VarianceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1937
- The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of VarianceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1937