Bank Runs and Institutions: The Perils of Intervention
Open Access
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 99 (4) , 1588-1607
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1588
Abstract
We study ex post efficient policy responses to a run on the banking system and the ex ante incentives these responses create. We show that the efficient response to a run is typically not to freeze all remaining deposits, since doing so imposes heavy costs on some individuals. Instead, once a run is underway, (benevolent) government institutions would allow additional deposit withdrawals, placing further strain on the banking system. When depositors anticipate these extra withdrawals, their incentive to participate in the run increases. In fact, ex post efficient interventions can generate the conditions necessary for a self-fulfilling run to occur. (JEL G21, G8)Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Money in a Theory of BankingAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- Demand–Deposit Contracts and the Probability of Bank RunsThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- Liquidity and Financial Market RunsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Fundamentals, Panics, and Bank Distress During the DepressionAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Equilibrium Bank RunsJournal of Political Economy, 2003
- BANK RUNS: DEPOSIT INSURANCE AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS*International Economic Review, 2002
- Demand deposit contracts, suspension of convertibility, and optimal financial intermediationEconomic Theory, 1991
- Banking Panics, Information, and Rational Expectations EquilibriumThe Journal of Finance, 1988
- Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and LiquidityJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal PlansJournal of Political Economy, 1977