Derivation of osteoclasts from hematopoietic colony-forming cells in culture
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 7 (3) , 353-362
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070316
Abstract
The osteoclast is known to be derived from the hematopoietic stem cell, but its lineage remains controversial. There is evidence that osteoclastic differentiation is induced through a contact‐dependent interaction between bone marrow stromal cells and hematopoietic precursors. To analyze osteoclastic lineage, colonies were generated in semisolid medium from mouse spleen cells in the presence of Wehi‐conditioned medium, interleukin‐3 (IL‐3), granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF), or macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) with or without erythropoietin (epo). After 5–8 days colonies were picked and phenotyped and incubated with 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25‐(OH)2D3] on bone slices or coverslips with bone marrow‐derived cell lines (ts8 or ST2) that induce osteoclastic differentiation. Cells of osteoclastic phenotype [as judged by calcitonin receptor (CTR) expression or bone resorption] were observed only in multilineage colonies. The ability of cells that generate macrophage colonies (CFU‐M) to generate osteoclasts was tested by incubating alveolar or peritoneal macrophages on ts8 or ST2 cells. Despite colony formation, no osteoclastic differentiation was detectable. Last, individual cells from blast cell colonies were incubated (1 cell per culture well) on ts8 or ST2 cells in the presence of 1,25‐(OH)2D3 and epo (to expose the lineage potential of the plated cell). We found CTR‐positive (CTRP) cells in 6 of 66 macrophage colonies, 7 of 12 granulocyte‐macrophage (GM) colonies, and 49 of 50 colonies containing multiple lineages other than GM colonies. No single‐lineage CTRP colonies were observed. Although most macrophage colonies did not contain CTRP, no CTRP were observed in colonies from which macrophages were absent. These results suggest that osteoclasts are derived from a multilineage precursor rather than from CFU‐M.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid publication: Impairment of macrophage colony-stimulating factor production and lack of resident bone marrow macrophages in the osteopetrotic op/op MouseJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor geneNature, 1990
- Generation of osteoclasts from hemopoietic cells and a multipotential cell line in vitroJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1989
- The effects of transplantation of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors on bone resorption in osteopetrotic ratsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1988
- Macrophages in T and B Cell Compartments and Other Tissue Macrophages Recognized by Monoclonal Antibody MOMA‐2Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 1987
- Recombinant murine granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor has megakaryocyte colony-stimulating activity and augments megakaryocyte colony stimulation by interleukin 3.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1987
- Abundant calcitonin receptors in isolated rat osteoclasts. Biochemical and autoradiographic characterization.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1986
- Human Recombinant Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Multilineage HematopoietinScience, 1985
- Properties of haematopoietic stem cells surviving 5-fluorouracil treatment: evidence for a pre-CFU-S cell?Nature, 1979
- Preparation of Iodine-131 Labelled Human Growth Hormone of High Specific ActivityNature, 1962