Further assessment of a method to estimate reliability and validity of qualitative research findings
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 15 (4) , 430-435
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01836.x
Abstract
The reliability and validity of qualitative research findings are viewed with scepticism by some scientists. This scepticism is derived from the belief that qualitative researchers give insufficient attention to estimating reliability and validity of data, and the differences between quantitative and qualitative methods in assessing data. The danger of this scepticism is that relevant and applicable research findings will not be used. Our purpose is to describe an evaluative strategy for use with qualitative data, a strategy that is a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. Results of the strategy and factors that influence its use are also described.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconciling Paradigm Assumptions of Qualitative and Quantitative ResearchWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1988
- Nursing Strategies to Influence Adolescent Hopefulness During Oncologic IllnessJournal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses, 1987
- Heuristic Heresy: Application of Reliability and Validity Criteria to Products of Grounded TheoryWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1986
- Reliability and Validity in Qualitative ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1986
- Inducing a definition of ‘hope’ through the use of grounded theory methodologyJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1984
- Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiryECTJ, 1982
- Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiriesECTJ, 1981
- Reliability and Validity AssessmentPublished by SAGE Publications ,1979