On the methodological weakness of ‘the effective number of codons’: a reply to Marashi and Najafabadi
- 4 February 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Vol. 327 (1) , 1-3
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.133
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- How reliable re-adjustment is: correspondence regarding A. Fuglsang, “The ‘effective number of codons’ revisited”Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2004
- The ‘effective number of codons’ revisitedBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2004
- The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a geneGene, 1990