Oral versus vaginal misoprostol administered one hour before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial
- 19 February 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 112 (4) , 456-460
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00255.x
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy of oral and vaginal misoprostol as cervical priming agents administered 1 hour before first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy. Design A randomised controlled trial. Setting Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London. Population Pregnant women of 10 weeks or less gestation attending the termination of pregnancy clinic. Methods Ninety eligible women were recruited to the study during September 2001 and September 2002. Women were randomised to one of the three groups: misoprostol administered orally (400 μg), misoprostol administered vaginally (800 μg) and standard care (no cervical priming agent) administered prior to surgical termination of pregnancy. Under general anaesthesia, and prior to the operation, a cervical tonometer was used to determine the main outcome measures. Main outcome measures Baseline cervical dilatation and the cumulative force required to dilate the cervix from 3 to 9 mm. Results There was no significant difference in the mean baseline cervical dilation (P= 0.16) or the cumulative force required to dilate the cervix (P= 0.12) between the three randomised groups. Conclusion No cervical priming effects were detectable with oral or vaginal misoprostol administered 1 hour before first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gemeprost versus misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- Misoprostol and PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Mifepristone versus vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester termination of pregnancy: A randomized, controlled studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- The use of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized trialHuman Reproduction, 1999
- A randomised comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Induced abortion: an audit of reported current pracl among consultant gynaecologists in Scotland*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Cervical priming with prostaglandin E1 analogues, misoprostol and gemeprostThe Lancet, 1994
- Prevention of uterine perforation during curettage abortionJAMA, 1984
- MEASURES TO PREVENT CERVICAL INJURY DURING SUCTION CURETTAGE ABORTIONThe Lancet, 1983
- PROSTAGLANDIN E2 PESSARIES TO FACILITATE FIRST TRIMESTER ASPIRATION TERMINATIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1981