Privacy, Birth Control and an Uncommonly Silly Law
- 5 August 1965
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 273 (6) , 322-323
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm196508052730609
Abstract
THE Supreme Court of the United States has, after many years of on-again, off-again litigation, struck down as unconstitutional the Connecticut statute barring the use of contraceptive devices or drugs. The case before the court, Griswold v. the State of Connecticut,1 involved a planned-parenthood clinic that was giving information and medical service to married couples on the best contraceptive materials for their personal use.Connecticut is the only state in the union with a law barring the use of contraceptives. Furthermore, the Supreme Court treated the case throughout as involving the privacy of married couples, the very status of . . .Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- The Right to PrivacyHarvard Law Review, 1890