DRUG DISCRIMINATION IN RATS UNDER CONCURRENT VARIABLE-INTERVAL VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 73 (1) , 103-120
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.73-103
Abstract
Eight rats were trained to discriminate pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent variable-interval (VI) VI schedule, on which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital were reinforced under VI 20 s and responses on the saline-biased lever were reinforced under VI 80 s. After saline, the reinforcement contingencies programmed on the two levers were reversed. The rats made 62.3% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 72.2% on the saline-biased lever after saline, both of which are lower than predicted by the matching law. When the schedule was changed to concurrent VI 50 s VI 50 s for test sessions with saline and the training dose of pentobarbital, responding on the pentobarbital-biased lever after the training dose of pentobarbital and on the saline-biased lever after saline became nearly equal, even during the first 2 min of the session, suggesting that the presence or absence of the training drug was exerting minimal control over responding and making the determination of dose—effect relations of drugs difficult to interpret. When the pentobarbital dose—response curve was determined under the concurrent VI 50-s VI 50-s schedule, responding was fairly evenly distributed on both levers for most rats. Therefore, 6 additional rats were trained to respond under a concurrent VI 60-s VI 240-s schedule. Under this schedule, the rats made 62.6% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 73.5% of their responses on the saline-biased lever after saline, which also is lower than the percentages predicted by perfect matching. When the schedule was changed to a concurrent VI 150-s VI 150-s schedule for 5-min test sessions with additional drugs, the presence or absence of pentobarbital continued to control responding in most rats, and it was possible to generate graded dose—response curves for pentobarbital and other drugs using the data from these 5-min sessions. The dose—response curves generated under these conditions were similar to the dose—response curves generated using other reinforcement schedules and other species.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER A CONCURRENT FIXED‐RATIO FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1999
- DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER A CONCURRENT FIXED-INTERVAL FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1997
- DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER A CONCURRENT SCHEDULEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1996
- Kinetics of matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1994
- EFFECTS OF SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT ON A PENTOBARBITAL DISCRIMINATION IN RATSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1991
- BIAS OF PHENCYCLIDINE DISCRIMINATION BY THE SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1984
- MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- FORMAL PROPERTIES OF THE MATCHING LAW1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- ON THE LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970