Ethosuximide, Valproic Acid, and Lamotrigine in Childhood Absence Epilepsy
Top Cited Papers
- 4 March 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 362 (9) , 790-799
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0902014
Abstract
Childhood absence epilepsy, the most common pediatric epilepsy syndrome, is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproic acid, or lamotrigine. The most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been defined. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the efficacy, tolerability, and neuropsychological effects of ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy. Drug doses were incrementally increased until the child was free of seizures, the maximal allowable or highest tolerable dose was reached, or a criterion indicating treatment failure was met. The primary outcome was freedom from treatment failure after 16 weeks of therapy; the secondary outcome was attentional dysfunction. Differential drug effects were determined by means of pairwise comparisons. The 453 children who were randomly assigned to treatment with ethosuximide (156), lamotrigine (149), or valproic acid (148) were similar with respect to their demographic characteristics. After 16 weeks of therapy, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar (53% and 58%, respectively; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. ethosuximide, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.98; P=0.35) and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine (29%; odds ratio with ethosuximide vs. lamotrigine, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.28; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. lamotrigine, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.06 to 5.42; P<0.001 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences among the three drugs with regard to discontinuation because of adverse events. Attentional dysfunction was more common with valproic acid than with ethosuximide (in 49% of the children vs. 33%; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.41; P=0.03). Ethosuximide and valproic acid are more effective than lamotrigine in the treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. Ethosuximide is associated with fewer adverse attentional effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00088452.)Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lamotrigine monotherapy for newly diagnosed typical absence seizures in childrenEpilepsy Research, 2008
- An Emerald EventJournal of Child Neurology, 2005
- Lamotrigine versus Valproic Acid as First‐line Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Typical Absence Seizures: An Open‐label, Randomized, Parallel‐group StudyEpilepsia, 2004
- Determining the Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognitive Function in Pediatric Patients With EpilepsyJournal of Child Neurology, 2004
- Determining the Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognitive Function in Pediatric Patients With EpilepsyJournal of Child Neurology, 2004
- Newly Diagnosed Unprovoked Epileptic Seizures: Presentation at Diagnosis in CAROLE StudyEpilepsia, 2001
- How Well Can Epilepsy Syndromes Be Identified at Diagnosis? A Reassessment 2 Years After Initial DiagnosisEpilepsia, 2000
- Proposal for Revised Classification of Epilepsies and Epileptic SyndromesEpilepsia, 1989
- Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on the type I error spending rate functionBiometrika, 1987
- Comparative Study of Ethosuximide and Sodium Valproate in the Treatment of Typical Absence Seizures (Petit Mal)Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1982