Do a threatened native amphibian and its invasive congener differ in response to human alteration of the landscape?
Open Access
- 6 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biological Invasions
- Vol. 12 (1) , 145-154
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9438-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction riskProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservationBiological Conservation, 2004
- Extinction risk from climate changeNature, 2004
- Relations between introduced fish and environmental conditions at large geographic scalesEcological Indicators, 2003
- Bullfrogs, Disturbance Regimes, and the Persistence of California Red-Legged FrogsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2003
- Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian ConservationConservation Biology, 2001
- Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages:information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM testsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1999
- ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTSAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1998
- Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structureAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1993
- Decline of Ranid Frog Species in Western North America: Are Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) Responsible?Journal of Herpetology, 1986