Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes among men
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 81 (3) , 555-563
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/81.3.555
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, few studies have compared the predictive power of overall obesity with that of central obesity. The cutoffs for waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) as measures of abdominal adiposity remain controversial. Objective: The objective was to compare body mass index (BMI), WC, and WHR in predicting type 2 diabetes. Design: A prospective cohort study (Health Professionals Follow-Up Study) of 27 270 men was conducted. WC, WHR, and BMI were assessed at baseline. Covariates and potential confounders were assessed repeatedly during the follow-up. Results: During 13 y of follow-up, we documented 884 incident type 2 diabetes cases. Age-adjusted relative risks (RRs) across quintiles of WC were 1.0, 2.0, 2.7, 5.0, and 12.0; those of WHR were 1.0, 2.1, 2.7, 3.6, and 6.9; and those of BMI were 1.0, 1.1, 1.8, 2.9, and 7.9 (P for trend < 0.0001 for all). Multivariate adjustment for diabetes risk factors only slightly attenuated these RRs. Adjustment for BMI substantially attenuated RRs for both WC and WHR. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis indicated that WC and BMI were similar and were better than WHR in predicting type 2 diabetes. The cumulative proportions of type 2 diabetes cases identified according to medians of BMI (≥24.8), WC (≥94 cm), and WHR (≥0.94) were 82.5%, 83.6%, and 74.1%, respectively. The corresponding proportions were 78.9%, 50.5%, and 65.7% according to the recommended cutoffs. Conclusions: Both overall and abdominal adiposity strongly and independently predict risk of type 2 diabetes. WC is a better predictor than is WHR. The currently recommended cutoff for WC of 102 cm for men may need to be reevaluated; a lower cutoff may be more appropriate.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Incident Diabetes in Jamaica: The Role of AnthropometryObesity Research, 2002
- Abdominal and total adiposity and risk of coronary heart disease in menInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Abdominal Adiposity and Coronary Heart Disease in WomenJAMA, 1998
- Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness— a critical reviewInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Body Fat Distribution and Risk of Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Women: The Nurses' Health StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Waist Circumference as the Best Predictor of Noninsulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM) Compared to Body Mass Index, Waist/hip Ratio and Other Anthropometric Measurements in Mexican Americans—A 7‐Year Prospective StudyObesity Research, 1997
- Body Size and Fat Distribution as Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease among Middle-aged and Older US MenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Obesity, Fat Distribution, and Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Clinical Diabetes in MenDiabetes Care, 1994
- Regional obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease; the Framingham studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- The Influence of Body Fat Distribution on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus: 13.5 Years of Follow-up of the Participants in the Study of Men Born in 1913Diabetes, 1985