The relationship between the abundances of bumblebees and honeybees in a native habitat
- 17 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Entomology
- Vol. 30 (1) , 47-57
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00660.x
Abstract
Abstract. 1. The western honeybee, Apis mellifera, has been introduced to many parts of the world and is sometimes purported to be detrimental to native bees because it reduces their food base. It is seldom viewed in this light in Europe; however, when beekeepers maintain very high bee densities, the species could also be displacing insects in its native European range by reducing the resource base.2. In England, populations of bumblebees (Bombus Latr. Hym.) have been decreasing both in terms of diversity and abundance, mainly because of a loss of habitat resulting from agricultural intensification. The impact of competition from other flower feeders is largely unknown.3. Nineteen dry lowland heaths in southern England were sampled once for honeybees and bumblebees. Honeybee abundance varied from 4 to 81 bees per 100 m2 (mean = 30.89, median = 23), whereas bumblebees varied from 2 to 17 individuals per 100 m2 (mean = 8.26, median = 7), belonging to between one and five species. There was a negative association between honeybee and bumblebee abundance but there was no apparent relationship between honeybee abundance and bumblebee diversity.4. The Bray–Curtis coefficient was used to compare the similarity in honeybee and bumblebee floral host breadth at these 19 sites. The coefficient was negatively associated with honeybee abundance: thus where honeybees were most abundant, bumblebees were fewer and/or foraged on different flower species.5. Foraging host breadth was also examined at four heathlands over a field season (April to September). No association between honeybee abundance and foraging host breadth was found for short‐tongued bees, although there was some evidence for a change in floral host breadth for long‐tongued bees.6. It is concluded that the impact of honeybees on bumblebees is complex. Although competition between the two species cannot be ruled out, it is perhaps equally likely that bumblebees decline in response to other factors, and that honeybees move independently of this decline.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scaleEcology Letters, 2003
- Food availability affects Osmia pumila (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) foraging, reproduction, and brood parasitismOecologia, 2003
- Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor websJournal of Animal Ecology, 2002
- Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland management regimesBiological Conservation, 2001
- The effect of introduced honeybees on native bee visitation and fruit-set in Dillwynia juniperina (Fabaceae) in a fragmented ecosystemBiological Conservation, 2001
- Resource use and foraging patterns of honeybees, Apis mellifera, and native insects on flowers of Eucalyptus costataAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1999
- Temperature and the pollinating activity of social beesEcological Entomology, 1993
- Effects of honey bees on colonies of Exoneura asimillima, an Australian native beeAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1991
- Competition for Nectar between Introduced Honey Bees and Native North American Bees and AntsEcology, 1983
- An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern WisconsinEcological Monographs, 1957