Toward Standardization of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Load Monitoring: Unfractionated Whole Blood as Preferred Clinical Specimen
Open Access
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 39 (4) , 1211-1216
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.4.1211-1216.2001
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load monitoring in peripheral blood has been shown to be a useful tool for the diagnosis of aberrant EBV infections. In the present study we compared the relative diagnostic values of EBV DNA load monitoring in unfractionated whole blood and simultaneously obtained serum or plasma samples from Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) patients, transplant recipients, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals, and infectious mononucleosis (IM) patients by a quantitative competitive PCR (Q-PCR). The EBV DNA load in BL patients was mainly situated in the cellular blood compartment (up to 4.5 × 10 6 copies/ml). EBV DNA loads in unfractionated whole blood and parallel serum samples showed no correlation. In transplant recipients, IM patients, and HIV-infected patients, the EBV burden in the circulation was almost exclusively restricted to the cellular blood compartment, because serum or plasma samples from these patients yielded negative results by Q-PCR, despite high viral loads in corresponding whole-blood samples. A 10-fold more sensitive but qualitative Bam HI-W-repeat PCR occasionally revealed the presence of EBV at <2,000 copies of EBV DNA per ml of serum. Spiking of 100 copies of EBV DNA in samples with negative Q-PCR results excluded the presence of inhibitory factors in serum or plasma that influenced the Q-PCR result. Serum samples from all populations were often positive for β-globin DNA, indicating cell damage in vivo or during serum preparation. We conclude that serum is an undesirable clinical specimen for EBV DNA load monitoring because it omits the presence of cell-associated virus and uncontrolled cell lysis may give irreproducible results or overestimation of the DNA load. Unfractionated whole blood is strongly preferred since it combines all blood compartments that may harbor EBV and it best reflects the absolute viral burden in the patient's circulation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequent monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in unfractionated whole blood is essential for early detection of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in high-risk patientsBlood, 2001
- Epstein–Barr virus: Co-opting B-cell memory and migrationCurrent Biology, 2000
- EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS-INDUCED POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERSTransplantation, 1999
- A novel quantitative multiplex NASBA method: application to measuring tissue factor and CD14 mRNA levels in human monocytesNucleic Acids Research, 1999
- EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS DNA IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LEUKOCYTES OF PATIENTS WITH POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASETransplantation, 1995
- The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCRJournal of General Virology, 1995
- Identification and molecular characterization of two diagnostically relevant marker proteins of the Epstein‐Barr virus capsid antigen complexJournal of Medical Virology, 1993
- Expression of c-myc and bcl-2 oncogene products in Reed-Sternberg cells independent of presence of Epstein-Barr virus.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Plasma DNA as Cell Death Marker in Elderly PatientsGerontology, 1993
- Avoiding false positives with PCRNature, 1989