Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension: systematic review
Top Cited Papers
- 28 August 2007
- Vol. 335 (7622) , 711
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39276.636354.ae
Abstract
Objective To review the accuracy of electrocardiography in screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension. Design Systematic review of studies of test accuracy of six electrocardiographic indexes: the Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell voltage index, Cornell product index, Gubner index, and Romhilt-Estes scores with thresholds for a positive test of ≥4 points or ≥5 points. Data sources Electronic databases ((Pre-)Medline, Embase), reference lists of relevant studies and previous reviews, and experts. Study selection Two reviewers scrutinised abstracts and examined potentially eligible studies. Studies comparing the electrocardiographic index with echocardiography in hypertensive patients and reporting sufficient data were included. Data extraction Data on study populations, echocardiographic criteria, and methodological quality of studies were extracted. Data synthesis Negative likelihood ratios, which indicate to what extent the posterior odds of left ventricular hypertrophy is reduced by a negative test, were calculated. Results 21 studies and data on 5608 patients were analysed. The median prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 33% (interquartile range 23-41%) in primary care settings (10 studies) and 65% (37-81%) in secondary care settings (11 studies). The median negative likelihood ratio was similar across electrocardiographic indexes, ranging from 0.85 (range 0.34-1.03) for the Romhilt-Estes score (with threshold ≥4 points) to 0.91 (0.70-1.01) for the Gubner index. Using the Romhilt-Estes score in primary care, a negative electrocardiogram result would reduce the typical pre-test probability from 33% to 31%. In secondary care the typical pre-test probability of 65% would be reduced to 63%. Conclusion Electrocardiographic criteria should not be used to rule out left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IVJournal of Human Hypertension, 2004
- Losartan benefits over atenolol in non‐smoking hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: The LIFE studyBlood Pressure, 2004
- The ECG and left ventricular hypertrophy in primary care hypertensivesJournal of Human Hypertension, 2001
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Bias in relative odds estimation owing to imprecise measurement of correlated exposuresStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality in hypertension: an analysis of data from the Glasgow Blood Pressure ClinicJournal Of Hypertension, 1990
- Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: Development and prospective validation of improved criteriaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophyAmerican Heart Journal, 1968
- The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1949