Methodological Issues in the Classification of Attention-Related Disorders
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 24 (2) , 72-77
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949102400203
Abstract
The classification and identification of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and related disorders involving learning and behavior are only rudimentarily developed. A major problem is the substantial overlap among children with attention, learning, and behavioral problems. The science of classification provides conceptual and methodological approaches addressing these problems. For successful classification of these children, major issues include (a) the need to provide explicit studies of identification criteria, (b) the need for systematic sampling strategies, (c) development of hypothetical classifications, and (d) systematic assessment of reliability and validity of hypothetical classifications. With the methodological advances provided by classification-oriented research, investigators and practitioners may be able to address issues involving definition and identification of children with attention and related disorders.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classification of learning disabilities: Old problems and new approaches.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Classification in neuropsychology: A theoretical framework and research paradigmJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1988
- Convergence between statistically derived behavior problem syndromes and child psychiatric diagnosesJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1988
- Critical issues in the instruction of the learning disabled.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Dimensional and Categorical Approaches to the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder in ChildrenJournal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1986
- How Shall We Individualize Instruction—Or Should We?Remedial and Special Education, 1984
- Bootstrapping conjectural indicators of vulnerability for schizophrenia: A Reply to Faraone's critique of Watt, Grubb, and Erlenmeyer-Kimling.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
- Evaluative criteria for psychiatric classification.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1976
- Monothetic and Polythetic Typologies and their Relation to Conceptualization, Measurement and ScalingAmerican Sociological Review, 1973
- Hypothesis-testing in ClassificationNature, 1966