The validity of arrestees' self-reports: Variations across questions and persons
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 19 (3) , 477-502
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095321
Abstract
Self-reports of 892 New York City arrestees were compared to urine tests and official criminal records. Disclosure was highest for any priors, incarceration, and recent marijuana use; moderate for cocaine/crack and heroin use and drug priors; but low for index priors and very low for violent priors (disclosure was higher among those who were currently facing these charges). Disclosure of a prior record proved to be a useful criterion for identifying which self-reports to trust. Interviewers' impressions and urine tests were unrelated to the disclosure of recent drug use or official histories. Disclosure of arrest was higher for men and arrestees with more priors.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Truth or consequences: the validity of self‐report data in health services research on addictionsAddiction, 2000
- The Validity of Juvenile Arrestees' Drug Use Reporting: A Gender ComparisonJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 2000
- THE MYTH OF SOCIAL CLASS AND CRIME REVISITED: AN EXAMINATION OF CLASS AND ADULT CRIMINALITY*Criminology, 2000
- Zero Tolerance: A Case Study of Police Policies and Practices in New York CityCrime & Delinquency, 1999
- Correlates of Underreporting Recent Drug Use by Female ArresteesJournal of Drug Issues, 1999
- Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experimentJustice Quarterly, 1995
- Self-Reports of Deviant Behavior: Predictive and Stable?The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1973
- Extent of Unrecorded Juvenile Delinquency Tentative ConclusionsThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1958
- Socioeconomic Status and Delinquent BehaviorAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1958