Responses of male codling moths (Laspeyresia pomonella) to codlemone and other alcohols in a wind tunnel
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 797-813
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01018774
Abstract
The primary pheromone (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (I, codle-mone), 11 further alcohols, and binary blends of both were evaluated for attractiveness as defined by the percentage ofL. pomonella males showing oriented upwind flight terminated by landing at the source within 10 min after release. Sources of I were attractive from 10−5 μg to 101 μg, with approx. 70% males responding at 10−3−10−1 μg. Most other alcohols also showed attractiveness, but the dose-response curves differed greatly with respect to the range of effective lure doses as well as the maximum response level reached at any dose. (E,E)-7,9-Undecadien-1-ol (III) revealed a dose-response curve similar in shape to I but shifted towards higher concentrations. (E,E)-8,10-Tridecadien-1-ol (II) and (E)-8,10-undecadien-1-ol (IV) exhibited threshold values of 10−5 μg (same as for I) and were effective over, respectively, seven and nine decades of source load, but they did not reach a response level of 40% at any test amount. (E)-9,11-Dodecadien-1-ol (VI) and the monoenes (E)-8-, (E)-10-, and (Z)-10-dodecen-1-ol (VIII-X) showed weak attractivity restricted to one to three test doses. Upwind approaches that broke off a few centimeters from the source were rarely seen in tests with I but frequently occurred with some of the analogs. When combined with 10−3 μg of I, all alcohol analogs showed “inhibitory” properties, although the amounts required to obtain a significant lowering of response differed by up to 105-fold. This amount was the lowest (10−4 μg) for the positional isomer VI, and the highest (101 μg) for undecan-1-ol (XI) and dodecan-1-ol (XII). With some mixtures, the presence of the inhibitor appeared to cause an alteration in landing behavior. No synergistic effects were seen in these tests. The results are briefly considered with respect to the sensory perception of the test stimuli and the involvement of minor components in the female pheromone blend.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex pheromone blend of the codling moth,Cydia pomonella: Evidence for a behavioral role of dodecan-1-olCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1985
- EVIDENCE FOR NATURALLY OCCURRING, SECONDARY COMPOUNDS OF THE CODLING MOTH FEMALE SEX PHEROMONEAustralian Journal of Entomology, 1981
- Environmental regulation of female calling and male pheromone response periodicities in the codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella)Journal of Insect Physiology, 1979
- Codling Moth:1 Mating Behavior in the LaboratoryAnnals of the Entomological Society of America, 1978
- Inhibitors of Sexual Attraction of Male Codling Moths12Environmental Entomology, 1975
- Sex attractant inhibitors of the codling mothLaspeyresia pomonella L.Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1974
- An Inhibitor of Sexual Attraction of Male Codling Moths 1 to a Synthetic Sex Pheromone and Virgin Females in TrapsEnvironmental Entomology, 1974
- Sex Pheromones: ( E , E )-8,10-Dodecadien-1-ol in the Codling MothScience, 1974
- Codling Moth: Influence of Temperature and Daylight Intensity on Periodicity of Daily Flight in the Field1Journal of Economic Entomology, 1973
- Codling Moth: 1 Diel Periodicity of Catch in Synthetic Sex Attractant vs. Female-Baited TrapsEnvironmental Entomology, 1973