A simple scoring system to evaluate the effects of cold ischemia on marginal liver donors1
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 77 (3) , 411-416
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000110318.70879.20
Abstract
Background. Exactly what constitutes a marginal donor remains ill defined. The authors set out to create a scoring system that objectively classifies a donor as marginal or nonmarginal and to define what the maximum acceptable preservation period is for the marginal liver to minimize early graft dysfunction. Methods. The authors performed an analysis on data collected prospectively of 397 cadaveric liver transplants. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on donor, recipient, and perioperative factors with relation to early allograft dysfunction. A score was developed that classified donors into marginal and nonmarginal populations, and the influence of cold ischemia was determined for each group. Results. Multivariate analysis-determined donor age and steatosis (moderate to severe) were independent predictors of deranged function. This enabled the authors to produce a scoring system to differentiate marginal donors with respect to risk of early allograft dysfunction as follows: Formula=(20.06×steatosis)+ (0.44×donor age), cutoff 23.1. In the marginal group, the cutoff value of cold ischemia time was 12.6 hr. Conclusions. The authors developed a scoring system that classified an organ as marginal or nonmarginal depending on the donor age and degree of steatosis. Marginal livers have a strong risk of developing early allograft dysfunction with increasing cold ischemia times and should be transplanted within 12 hr. Cold ischemia time was not found to be an important factor in the development of early allograft dysfunction in nonmarginal donors.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marginal grafts: finding the correct treatment for fatty liversTransplant International, 2003
- Evaluation of potential liver donors: Limits imposed by donor variables in liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2003
- Organ survival after primary dysfunction of liver grafts in clinical orthotopic liver transplantationTransplant International, 2000
- USE OF LIVERS WITH MICROVESICULAR FAT SAFELY EXPANDS THE DONOR POOLTransplantation, 1997
- Is the use of marginal donors justified in liver transplantation? Analysis of results and proposal of modern criteriaTransplant International, 1996
- Policies in Europe on "marginal quality" donor liversThe Lancet, 1994
- Selecting the Donor Liver: Risk Factors for Poor Function After Orthotopic Liver TransplantationHepatology, 1994
- RISK FACTORS FOR PRIMARY DYSFUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION—A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSISTransplantation, 1993
- Selection and Timing of Liver Transplantation in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Primary Sclerosing CholangitisHepatology, 1992
- THE INFLUENCE OF PRESERVATION INJURY ON REJECTION IN THE HEPATIC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTTransplantation, 1990