Democracy and Liberty

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Main Ideas The fundamental idea of democratic, political legitimacy is that the authorization to exercise state power must arise from the collective decisions of the equal members of a society who are governed by that power. That is a very abstract statement of the concept of democracy – as abstract as it should be. Democracy comes in many forms, and more determinate conceptions of it depend on an account of membership in the people and, correspondingly, what it takes for a decision to be collective – authorized by citizens as a body. Consider two conceptions of democracy, distinguished by their interpretations of the fundamental idea of collective decision: I will call them aggregative and deliberative. Both views apply in the first instance to institutions of binding collective decision making, and each interprets the fundamental ideal that such institutions are to treat people bound by collective decisions as equals. According to an aggregative conception of democracy, then, decisions are collective just in case they arise from arrangements of binding collective choice that give equal consideration to – more generically, are positively responsive to – the interests of each person bound by the decisions. According to a deliberative conception, a decision is collective just in case it emerges from arrangements of binding collective choice that establish conditions of free public reasoning among equals who are governed by the decisions.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: