A comparison of anxiolytic and nonanxiolytic agents in the shock-probe/burying test for anxiolytics
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Vol. 36 (1) , 203-205
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(90)90151-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antipanic drug treatments: Failure to exhibit anxiolytic-like effects on defensive burying behaviorPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1990
- A comparison of buspirone and chlordiazepoxide in the shock-probe/burying test for anxiolyticsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1988
- Conditioned defensive burying as a model for identifying anxiolyticsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1988
- Ro 15-1788, CGS 8216, picrotoxin, and pentylenetetrazol: Do they antagonize anxiolytic drug effects through an anxiogenic action?Brain Research Bulletin, 1987
- The effects of diazepam on “fear” reactions in rats are modulated by environmental constraints on the rat's defensive repertoirePharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1986
- The shock probe conflict procedure. A new assay responsive to benzodiazepines, barbiturates and related compoundsPsychopharmacology, 1986
- The inhibitory effect of diazepam on defensive burying: Anxiolytic vs. analgesic effectsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1985
- Animal models for the study of anti-anxiety agents: A reviewNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 1985
- Defensive burying: Effects of diazepam and oxprenolol measured in extinctionLife Sciences, 1983
- Conditioned defensive burying: A new paradigm for the study of anxiolytic agentsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1981