Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Standardization and Comparability of CASA Instruments
  Journal of Andrology, 1992
• The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis
  Fertility and Sterility, 1990
• Determination of the Precision of an Automated Semen Analyzer
  Laboratory Medicine, 1990
• Quality Control During the Conventional Analysis of Semen, An Essential Exercise
  Journal of Andrology, 1989
• Evaluation of the CellSoft automated semen analysis system in a routine laboratory setting
  Fertility and Sterility, 1988
• Standardization and quality control of sperm concentration and sperm motility counts in semen analysis
  Human Reproduction, 1986
• Errors Inherent in the Performance of a Routine Semen Analysis
  British Journal of Urology, 1983
• FACTORS AFFECTING HAEMOCYTOMETER COUNTS OF SPERM CONCENTRATION IN HUMAN SEMEN
  Reproduction, 1964
• The Errors of Some Haematological Methods as They Are Used in a Routine Laboratory
  Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1948
• THE ERROR OF ESTIMATE OF THE BLOOD CELL COUNT AS MADE WITH THE HEMOCYTOMETER
  American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1939