The Motorization and Decline of Urban Public Transit, 1935–1950
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 41 (3) , 579-600
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002205070004434x
Abstract
Were intracity motor buses economically inferior to electric streetcars and electric buses in the late 1930s and l940s? The contention that they were has recently served as the basis for allegations that the decline of urban public transit was attributable, in large part, to an organized campaign intent on eliminating viable public transit. Aggregate data from trade sources allows a comparative cost and profit analysis of motor buses, electric buses, and electric streetcars for the years 1935–1950. The analysis supports the contention that motor buses were inferior. Questions regarding the applicability of criticisms of market foreclosure theory are also considered.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The JitneysThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1972
- The Yellow Cab Antitrust CaseThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1972
- In Defense of AntitrustColumbia Law Review, 1965
- The Crisis in AntitrustColumbia Law Review, 1965
- Vertical Integration and Antitrust PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 1950
- THE INFLUENCE OF THE OUTBREAK OF WAR ON DRUNKENNESS AND ATTEMPTED SUICIDE*British Journal of Inebriety, 1940