Does Overtraining Exist?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sports Medicine
- Vol. 34 (14) , 967-981
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200434140-00003
Abstract
Athletes experience minor fatigue and acute reductions in performance as a consequence of the normal training process. When the balance between training stress and recovery is disproportionate, it is thought that overreaching and possibly overtraining may develop. However, the majority of research that has been conducted in this area has investigated overreached and not overtrained athletes. Overreaching occurs as a result of intensified training and is often considered a normal outcome for elite athletes due to the relatively short time needed for recovery (approximately 2 weeks) and the possibility of a supercompensatory effect. As the time needed to recover from the overtraining syndrome is considered to be much longer (months to years), it may not be appropriate to compare the two states. It is presently not possible to discern acute fatigue and decreased performance experienced from isolated training sessions, from the states of overreaching and overtraining. This is partially the result of a lack of diagnostic tools, variability of results of research studies, a lack of well controlled studies and individual responses to training. The general lack of research in the area in combination with very few well controlled investigations means that it is very difficult to gain insight into the incidence, markers and possible causes of overtraining. There is currently no evidence aside from anecdotal information to suggest that overreaching precedes overtraining and that symptoms of overtraining are more severe than overreaching. It is indeed possible that the two states show different defining characteristics and the overtraining continuum may be an oversimplification. Critical analysis of relevant research suggests that overreaching and overtraining investigations should be interpreted with caution before recommendations for markers of overreaching and overtraining can be proposed. Systematically controlled and monitored studies are needed to determine if overtraining is distinguishable from overreaching, what the best indicators of these states are and the underlying mechanisms that cause fatigue and performance decrements. The available scientific and anecdotal evidence supports the existence of the overtraining syndrome; however, more research is required to state with certainty that the syndrome exists.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis of OvertrainingSports Medicine, 2002
- Overtraining effects on immunity and performance in athletesImmunology & Cell Biology, 2000
- Effects of Intensive Exercise Training on Immunity in AthletesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1998
- Changes in Plasma Tryptophan/Branched Chain Amino Acid Ratio in Responses to Training Volume VariationInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1997
- The Emerging Role of Glutamine as an Indicator of Exercise Stress and OvertrainingSports Medicine, 1996
- Overtraining in AthletesSports Medicine, 1991
- A tool for measuring stress tolerance in elite athletesJournal of Applied Sport Psychology, 1990
- Mood state and salivary cortisol levels following overtraining in female swimmersPsychoneuroendocrinology, 1989
- Psychological monitoring of overtraining and staleness.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987
- Effect of Training on Plasma Anabolic and Catabolic Steroid Hormones and Their Response During Physical ExerciseInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986