Effects of genotype × environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs1
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 83 (1) , 49-61
- https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83149x
Abstract
Genotype × environment interaction (G × E) is increasingly important, because breeding programs tend to be more internationally oriented. The aim of this theoretical study was to investigate the effects of G × E on genetic gain in sib-testing and progeny-testing schemes. Loss of genetic gain due to G × E was predicted for different values of heritability, number of progeny per dam, number of progeny per sire, proportion of selected sires, and population size in the selection environment. Two environments were considered: a selection environment (SLE) and a production environment (PDE). The breeding goal was only for performance in PDE. A pseudo-BLUP selection index was used to predict genetic gain. Recording of half-sibs or progeny in PDE limited the loss in genetic gain in PDE due to G × E between SLE and PDE. Progeny-testing schemes had less loss in genetic gain than sib-testing schemes. Higher heritability increased the loss in genetic gain, whereas increasing the number of progeny per sire in PDE decreased the loss in genetic gain. The number of progeny per sire required to minimize loss in genetic gain due to G × E was greater for sib-testing schemes than for progeny-testing schemes. More progeny per dam slightly increased the loss in genetic gain. Genetic gains for sex-limited and carcass traits were less affected by G × E than traits measured on both sexes. Loss in genetic gain was due to decreased accuracy of selection in most situations, but it was due to decreased selection intensity in situations with small population size and a low proportion of selected sires. It was concluded that recording performance of relatives in PDE minimizes loss in genetic gain due to G × E, and that progeny-testing schemes rather than sib-testing schemes are preferable in situations with low to moderate heritability (h2 ≤ 0.3), relatively short generation interval of progeny-tested sires (Lprog/Lsib ≤ 1.7), and moderate to severe G × E interaction (rg ≤ 0.8). Copyright © 2005. . Copyright 2005 Journal of Animal ScienceKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic gain of pure line selection and combined crossbred purebred selection with constrained inbreedingAnimal Science, 2001
- Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred informationAnimal Science, 1998
- Asymptotic response to selection on best linear unbiased predictors of breeding valuesAnimal Science, 1992
- Genetic and clonal responses in closed dairy cattle nucleus schemesAnimal Science, 1991
- Implications of genotype–environment interactions in animal breeding: genotype–location interactions in poultryWorld's Poultry Science Journal, 1990
- Implications of selection for secondary traits on MOET-nucleus cattle breeding programs for dairy and dual-purpose breedsLivestock Production Science, 1989
- Genotype environment interaction in pig breeding programmes: Methods of estimation and relevance of the estimatesLivestock Production Science, 1985
- Inbreeding under Selection from Related FamiliesPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- The Effect of Selection on Genetic VariabilityThe American Naturalist, 1971
- The Problem of Environment and SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1952