The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 60 (3) , 239-257
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376311
Abstract
This qualitative case study examines the nature of the competing information campaigns offered by environmental and timber industry groups as they conflict over the Northern spotted owl and “old growth” forests in the Pacific Northwest. Environmental advocacy literature is reviewed and background of the debate is provided. The competing information campaigns are shown to comprise a synchronous, spiral‐like logic of interaction in which antagonists mirror or match each other's rhetorical and communicative strategies. The study suggests that even in the absence of direct communication between disputants, the opposing political information campaigns are co‐created within a system characterized by necessity and constraint.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spectator politics and the revival of public argumentCommunication Monographs, 1992
- White noise: The perils of mass mediated democracyCommunication Monographs, 1992
- The political‐media complexCommunication Monographs, 1992
- Telling the farmers’ story: Competing responses to soil conservation rhetoricQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Communication theories and other curiosCommunication Monographs, 1991
- On withholding political voice: An analysis of the political vocabulary of a “nonpolitical” speech communityQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas ModelAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- Chernobyl: The packaging of transnational ecological disasterCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
- The new Christian right and the humanist response: Reciprocated diatribeCommunication Quarterly, 1987
- Constructing a Social Problem: The Press and the EnvironmentSocial Problems, 1979