The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act: Means-Testing or Mean Spirited?
Preprint
- 1 March 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Thousands of U.S. households filed for bankruptcy just before the bankruptcy law changed in 2005. That rush-to-file was more pronounced, we find, in states with more generous bankruptcy exemptions and lower credit scores. We take that finding as evidence that the new law effectively reduces exemptions, which in turn should reduce the "demand" for bankruptcy and the resulting losses to suppliers of consumer credit. We expect the savings to suppliers will be shared with borrowers by way of lower credit card rates, although credit card spreads have not yet fallen. If cheaper credit is the upside of the new law, the downside is reduced bankruptcy "insurance" against bad luck. The overall impact of the new law on the average household depends on how one weighs those two sides.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bankruptcy Law and EntrepreneurshipAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2008
- Personal Bankruptcy and Credit Market CompetitionSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Financial innovations and corporate bankruptcyJournal of Financial Intermediation, 2005
- An Economic Analysis of the Consumer Bankruptcy CrisisSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Fresh Start or Head Start? The Effect of Filing for Personal Bankruptcy on the Labor SupplySSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Bankruptcy and Small Firms' Access to CreditThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2004
- Personal Bankruptcy and the Level of Entrepreneurial ActivityThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2003
- A Quantitative Theory of Unsecured Consumer Credit with Risk of DefaultSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Forum Shopping and Personal BankruptcySSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Bankruptcy and the Market for Mortgage and Home Improvement LoansJournal of Urban Economics, 2001