The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it?: Observer agreement of categorical assessments
- 26 January 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 337 (8735) , 215-218
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)92169-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Birth asphyxia and the intrapartum cardiotocographBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Obstetric accidents: a review of 64 cases.BMJ, 1990
- Observer reproducibility in grading dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: comparison between two different grading systems.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven yearsThe Lancet, 1990
- Observer variability in histopathological reporting of transitional cell carcinoma and epithelial dysplasia in bladders.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- A comparison of three methods of assessing interobserver variation applied to measurement of the symphysis‐fundal heightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- CEREBRAL PALSY AMONG CHILDREN BORN DURING THE DUBLIN RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAPARTUM MONITORINGThe Lancet, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Observer variability in reporting of breast lesions.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1985
- The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985