Curtailing the High Rate of Late-Stage Attrition of Investigational Therapeutics Against Unprecedented Targets in Patients with Lung and Other Malignancies
- 15 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (12) , 4220s-4226s
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-040013
Abstract
A greater understanding of the pathogenesis and biology of cancer coupled with major advances in biotechnology has resulted in the identification of rationally designed, target-based (RDTB) anticancer therapeutics, ushering in new therapeutic opportunities and high expectations for the future as well as developmental challenges. Because these agents appear to principally target malignant cells, it is expected that they will produce less toxicity at clinically effective doses than nonspecific cytotoxic agents, but their target requirements are likely to be much more stringent. The innate complexity of the networks that contain elements targeted by these agents also decreases the probability that any single therapeutic manipulation will result in robust clinical activity and success when used alone, particularly in patients with solid malignancies that have multiple relevant signaling aberrations. In contrast, proof of principle and robust antitumor activity may be most efficiently demonstrated in nonrandomized evaluations involving tumors that are principally driven by aberrations of the specific target. The predominant therapeutic manifestation of RDTB agents in preclinical studies is due to decreased tumor growth rates and will likely be similar in the clinic; however, such manifestations are not readily detectable and quantifiable using nonrandomized clinical evaluations. To curtail the increasing rate of late-stage attrition of RDTB agents, which, if maintained, will stymie progress in cancer therapy, the design of initial nonrandomized evaluations, particularly the selection of tumors and patients, must be guided by the principal biological features of the agents. Next, evaluations, some of which must be randomized, can be performed in a wide range of tumor types, depending on the presence and relevance of the target. To validate the concept of RDTB therapeutics and to realize their full potential, radically different development, evaluation, and regulatory paradigms must be adopted.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib TherapyScience, 2004
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Phase II Trial of Gefitinib in Recurrent GlioblastomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- The Role of the FDA in the National Cancer Program: Friend or Foe?The Oncologist, 2003
- 33 Phase I study of OSI-774 alone or with temozolomide in patients with malignant gliomaEuropean Journal of Cancer Supplements, 2003
- Oncology's trialsNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2003
- Challenges of Developing Therapeutics That Target Signal Transduction in Patients With Gynecologic and Other MalignanciesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Improving the evaluation of new cancer treatments: challenges and opportunitiesNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- The rapamycin-sensitive signal transduction pathway as a target for cancer therapyOncogene, 2000
- Paclitaxel (Taxol)New England Journal of Medicine, 1995