Understanding Street‐Level Bureaucrats' Decision Making: Determining Eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program
Top Cited Papers
- 11 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration Review
- Vol. 70 (2) , 247-257
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02131.x
Abstract
Personal interactions between clients and street‐level bureaucrats are significant in explaining why street‐level bureaucrats behave as they do. Not all bureaucracies that apply program rules to individuals, however, engage face‐to‐face with their clientele. As more intake procedures are automated, such “one‐on‐one” encounters decrease. The author generates and tests hypotheses about frontline bureaucratic decision making in the Social Security Disability program, by applying bounded rationality theory. The findings show that eligibility decisions by street‐level bureaucrats are affected by their adherence to subsets of agency goals and perceptions of others in the governance system. How quickly they make decisions also has an impact. There is no evidence that the way in which bureaucrats evaluate clients explains their decisions when they lack face‐to‐face contact.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- At the Discretion of Rogue Agents: How Automation Improves Women's Outcomes in Unemployment InsuranceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008
- Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy ImplementationJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2007
- Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global WarmingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2007
- STREET‐LEVEL BUREAUCRACY AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITYPublic Administration, 2007
- Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual AssaultPublic Administration Review, 2006
- The Political Roots of Disability Claims: How State Environments and Policies Shape Citizen DemandsPolitical Research Quarterly, 2006
- Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager's Role AmbiguityJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2006
- Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative BureaucracyAmerican Political Science Review, 2002
- Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare AdministrationSocial Service Review, 1997
- Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and ChoicePublic Administration Review, 1972