an analysis of Rofaifo mammal taxonomy
- 1 August 1976
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Ethnologist
- Vol. 3 (3) , 425-445
- https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1976.3.3.02a00030
Abstract
Analysis of a New Guinea folk classification of mammals reveals considerable correspondence for entities perceived and labeled by folk and scientific zoologists, but notable differences in the cognitive status accorded those entities in the two classificatory systems. The cognitive status of folk categories may be best understood in a relativistic frame rather than by assigning them to fixed positions within a formalized hierarchy of conceptual states. Taxonomic evolution has been dominated by shifts in the conceptual level for archetypal categories, with upgrading of categories more frequent than the reverse. Categories with connotative rather than denotative referents seem to be appropriate candidates for upgrading.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phylogeographic relationships within the Mediterranean turbot inferred by mitochondrial DNA haplotype variationJournal of Fish Biology, 2004
- a measure of the degree of correspondence of folk to scientific biological classification1American Ethnologist, 1975
- The Tenejapa Tzeltal Version of the Animal KingdomAnthropological Quarterly, 1975
- Folk biology in the New Guinea HighlandsSocial Science Information, 1974
- Folk Systematics in Relation to Biological Classification and NomenclatureAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973
- General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk BiologyAmerican Anthropologist, 1973
- Speculations on the growth of ethnobotanical nomenclatureLanguage in Society, 1972
- Covert Categories and Folk TaxonomiesAmerican Anthropologist, 1968
- Folk Taxonomies and Biological ClassificationScience, 1966
- Zoological Classification System of a Primitive PeopleScience, 1966