Searching for information on outcomes: do you need to be comprehensive?
Open Access
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 7 (3) , 163-167
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.163
Abstract
The concepts of evidence-based practice and clinical effectiveness are reliant on up to date, accurate, high quality, and relevant information. Although this information can be obtained from a range of sources, computerised databases such as MEDLINE offer a fast, effective means of bringing up to date information to clinicians, as well as health service and information professionals. Common problems when searching for information from databases include missing important relevant papers or retrieving too much information. Effective search strategies are therefore necessary to retrieve a manageable amount of relevant information. This paper presents a range of strategies which can be used to locate information on MEDLINE efficiently and effectively.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designing a search strategy to identify and retrieve articles on evidence‐based health care using MEDLINEHealth Libraries Review, 1997
- Designing a search strategy to identify and retrieve articles onevidence‐based health care using MEDLINEHealth Libraries Review, 1997
- Confusion of levels in monitoring outcomes and/or processThe Lancet, 1996
- The quality and impact of MEDLINE searches performed by end usersHealth Libraries Review, 1995
- Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1993 updateQuality of Life Research, 1995
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINEJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994