Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 7 (2) , 137-153
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380852
Abstract
Federal forest land in the Pacific Northwest has become the focus of a regional and national debate concerning the protection of natural environmental systems and the economic and cultural vitality of local communities. At the heart of this debate are different values about forests and human relationships to forests. This study examines the degree to which the public embraces differing values about federal forests nationally and regionally. Findings suggest strong biocentric value orientations toward forests among the public in both cases. It is further suggested that the value orientations of citizens are strongly related to policy preferences for federal forest lands.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The U.S. forest service: Toward the new resource management paradigm?Society & Natural Resources, 1992
- Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activismSociety & Natural Resources, 1992
- The Changing Face of the Environmental CoalitionEnvironment and Behavior, 1992
- Ecology, Community and LifestylePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Voluntary association membership of outdoor recreationists: An exploratory studyLeisure Sciences, 1988
- Value Change in Industrial SocietiesAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- The “New Environmental Paradigm”The Journal of Environmental Education, 1978
- On Being Morally ConsiderableThe Journal of Philosophy, 1978
- The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗Inquiry, 1973
- Patterns of Bias in Samples Based on Telephone DirectoriesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1971