Number Needed to Treat: A Statistic Relevant for Physical Therapists
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
- Vol. 80 (12) , 1214-1219
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.12.1214
Abstract
The number needed to treat (NNT) is a method of reporting outcomes from clinical trials.1 Treatment efficacy is determined by evaluating the outcome of one treatment relative to another treatment or to a control group when the only difference between the groups is the intervention of interest. The NNT can also be used to express the size of the outcome of one treatment relative to another. The NNT is expressed in terms designed to help decide whether the intervention might be valuable in clinical practice: the number of patients who need to be treated before a therapist can be sure that one patient improved who would not have improved without the intervention. For example, when comparing treatment X and treatment Y, an NNT score of 5 for treatment X indicates that, on average, after treating 5 patients, treatment X will have achieved one more positive outcome than if treatment Y had been used. The NNT does not tell the clinician which of those 5 patients will respond, only that 1 patient is likely to do so.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Colles’ fracture patients benefit from routine referral to physiotherapy following cast removal?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2000
- Increasing Hamstring Flexibility Decreases Lower Extremity Overuse Injuries in Military Basic TraineesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1999
- Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and UtilizationPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1999
- Confidence Limits Made Easy: Interval Estimation Using a Substitution MethodAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Economic Analysis of Respiratory RehabilitationChest, 1997
- Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical PracticeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Efficacy of Electromyographic Biofeedback Compared With Conventional Physical Therapy for Upper-Extremity Function in Patients Following Stroke: A Research Overview and Meta-analysisPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1994
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988