The future supply of physicians

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Many health services researchers point to a growing surplus of physicians by the end of the century. The author discusses in detail a variety of policy positions, from the Flexner Report onward, that have affected the present and projected supplies of U.S. physicians. These include the American Medical Association's decades of efforts to control the numbers and types of U.S. medical students; effects of Medicare and Medicaid; changes in immigration and naturalization laws that increased the number of international medical graduates (IMGs); the medical community's non-response to the 1981 GMENAC Report's forecasts on physician oversupply; growth in the numbers of specialists; the fall and subsequent rise in the numbers of applicants to medical schools; the changing composition of the physician workforce; the refusal of the medical profession to consider a shorter training period for physicians; and other events from the past that can inform today's policymakers. The author then evaluates four policy recommendations that have evolved to deal with the problem of physician oversupply, and concludes that (1) reliance on the market to contain physician supply is unwarranted; (2) there is little prospect that Congress will soon reduce the inflow of IMGs, and even if it did, such action would have a marginal effect; (3) there is no prospect that 20-25% of U.S. medical schools will be closed by 2005, since the forces militating against such action are overwhelming; and (4) it remains to be seen whether the new health care environment will have more than a marginal effect in altering the current ratio of primary care to specialist physicians in the years ahead. In fact, if future outlays for health care increase as predicted, there should be sufficient funds for physician supply to continue to grow and for specialists to continue to make good incomes.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: